Talk:Classes

Novice/Super Novice
Novice			Super Novice
First Class
Swordman	Magician	Archer	Merchant	Thief	Acolyte
2-1
Knight	Wizard	Hunter	Blacksmith	Assassin	Priest
2-1 Transcendent
Lord Knight	High Wizard	Sniper	Mastersmith	Assassin Cross	High Priest
2-2
Crusader	Sage	Bard/Dancer	Alchemist	Rogue	Monk
2-2 Transcendent
Paladin	Scholar	Minstrel/Gypsy	Biochemist	Stalker	Champion
Expanded
TaeKwon Kid		Ninja		Gunslinger
Soul Linker	TaeKwon Master

In other news, who picked these colors? Christ. Can we get some that people who aren't blind don't find offensive? --Resplendent 20:09, 9 November 2007 (MST)

I modified it. Do you like it now? Hadas 23:20, 9 November 2007 (MST)

Modified version:

Novices
Novice						Super Novice
First Jobs
Swordman		Magician		Archer		Merchant		Thief		Acolyte
Second Jobs
Knight	Crusader	Wizard	Sage	Hunter	Bard/Dancer	Blacksmith	Alchemist	Assassin	Rogue	Priest	Monk
Transcendent Novices
High Novice
Transcendent First Jobs
High First Class
Transcendent Second Jobs
Lord Knight	Paladin	High Wizard	Scholar	Sniper	Minstrel/Gypsy	Mastersmith	Biochemist	Assassin Cross	Stalker	High Priest	Champion
Expanded Jobs
TaeKwon Kid				Ninja				Gunslinger
Soul Linker		TaeKwon Master

My only concern with both tables is where does High First Class fit in? Colors are a defininite improvement. The font size in yours also seems a little small. --Resplendent 23:34, 9 November 2007 (MST)

I like the font size on mine. In any case, I adjusted the colors a little bit more and put High First Class and High Novice in. Hadas 07:15, 10 November 2007 (MST)

I hope you guys know exactly where you're going to put third classes in, otherwise this is just pointless... --Deviattor 08:04, 10 November 2007 (MST)

It depends on what the progression is, whether it's Novice > First Job > Second Job > Third Job, Novice > First Job > Second Job > High Novice > High First Job > Trans Second Job > Third Job. Regardless of which it is, adding another row is not a difficult task. Hadas 08:30, 10 November 2007 (MST)

I made this a while ago. It shows the progressions a bit more clearly... Is it needed? --Steax 03:54, 30 May 2008 (MDT)

A somewhat shorter version could probably do well in the About section. --Resplendent 08:26, 30 May 2008 (MDT)

Shortened in what manner? Remove the job names themselves? --Steax 19:36, 30 May 2008 (MDT)

That'd probably help. Anything to keep the page to about the length it is now. --Resplendent 23:42, 30 May 2008 (MDT)

Ok, I've uploaded a new version without the job names, now just the progression. --Steax 00:33, 1 June 2008 (MDT)